11 Comments
User's avatar
Lorna Arcand's avatar

It seems to me that our current "town attorney" has not been serving our BOS or other town government very well this past year. If our BOS is getting actually getting and following advice from the attorney then why are we facing lawsuits from former employees? I could be wrong but I would think attorneys for any town would be following rules and regulations that benefit their client, the town. If anyone in our government is not properly following rules and regulations it should not be the town attorney's job to shield that person or entity.

So, who exactly does a town attorney work for?

Expand full comment
Doug Bates's avatar

The town attorney is appointed and overseen by the BOS. So, in the closest sense, they work for the BOS. The BOS works for the town. Thus the town attorney is one step removed from working for the town. As such, if there's a conflict between what's good for the town and what's good for the people who hired them, they're going to either have to do what's good for the people who hired them, or lose their job.

There's also the issue of the agency problem. Agents - in this case, the town attorney - are incentivized to do what is in their best interests, even if doing so is not in the best interests of their client, so long as the client is unable to perceive what's going on.

Expand full comment
Lorna Arcand's avatar

As long as their fees come from taxpayers that is who they work for IMHO

Expand full comment
Bob Chesley's avatar

Excellent citizen journalism as always!

Expand full comment
Mary Crockett's avatar

Thank you Doug. I greatly appreciate all you are doing to keep us informed.

Expand full comment
Beth's avatar

Doug, this is once again a tremendous amount of information to download and you’ve done a great job clearly laying it all out. Thank you for all the time and effort you’ve put into this.

Expand full comment
Lisa Allen Kennard's avatar

Excellent writing and clearly you have proven to me of the BOS wrong-doings.

Expand full comment
Nancy's avatar

Thank you for bringing all this information. There are many who are concerned about how this was handled. If speaks volumes that The BOS is trying to block this review. As you said if nothing was done wrong there should be no reason to block a review.

Expand full comment
Lorna Arcand's avatar

They might very well be only listening to the attorneys on these matters.

Expand full comment
Jack in the box's avatar

I think that excuse has expired.

Expand full comment
Jack in the box's avatar

Once again, outstanding work from Mr. Bates.

The citizens of Nottingham salute you.

Absolutely disgusting, disgraceful, reprehensible, dishonest behavior from the BoS.

Have to wonder what they think they’ll gain from this other than a strong vote of no confidence at this weekends deliberative session.

Also have to wonder what they’re so desperately trying to hide?

Imagine going to these lengths over nothing?

The humiliation they’ve brought to Nottingham is unacceptable.

Power is with the people, the citizens, it’s time for this BoS group to move on before they cause any more damage to our community.

Expand full comment